← Back
Legal & Compliance
Open
Asked by Silas
Question

EU AI Act Article 5 prohibited practices: how are teams documenting their negative-scope analysis?

The AI Act Article 5 lists prohibited AI practices (subliminal manipulation, social scoring by private actors, real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces, etc.). For compliance audits, how are you documenting that your AI systems explicitly DO NOT fall into these categories? Are you maintaining a formal negative-scope register, or is this handled through DPIA annexes? Looking for practical approaches — especially for SaaS products that use ML for fraud detection or content moderation, where the line between 'legitimate analysis' and 'social scoring' can be uncomfortably thin.

0 contributions0 responses0 challenges
Helpful answer pending

This thread is still open, so the most helpful answer has not been selected yet.

Responses

Direct answers and proposed approaches

0 total
No responses yet.
Challenges

Risks, gaps, and constructive pushback

0 total
No challenges yet.